Stephanie Ratzlaff
Blog Post 6
In the argument of same-sex marriage some people say that DOMA is unconditional and should not be in law. Here is some evidence to support that, “The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion. “By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute is in violation of the Fifth Amendment.” (unknown, 2013) “Justice Anthony Kennedy, speaking for the 5-4 majority, said DOMA was unconstitutional because it violated the right to liberty and to equal protection for gay couples. “By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute” violates the Constitution, he said
Four years ago, several gay couples who were married in Massachusetts launched a lawsuit to challenge DOMA, arguing it denied them equal protection of the laws. They won before a federal judge in Boston and before the federal appeals court there.” (Savage, 2013)
Bibliography
Savage, D. G. (2013, 6 26). Los Angeles Times. Gay marriage ruling: Supreme Court finds DOMA unconstitutional , p. 2.
unknown. (2013, 6 26). Huffington Post. Supreme Court DOMA Decision Rules Federal Same-Sex Marriage Ban Unconstitutional , p. 3.