Outline

Introduction

• Conflict Summary

1. What was the Voting Rights Act, and what it was need for
2. The Verdict, how it impacted the country
3. Why was the Voting Rights Act called into question

• Conflict

1. What the Voting Rights act actually means without section
2. Chances of the discrimination continuing
3. Discrimination is still active in this country

Sources Analysis

• What my sources where and what knowledge they gave me

Discussion

• What I think the best outcome for the conflict can be.
• the rulings language allowing the court to change it back at their discretion.
• Pros and Cons of the outcome of section 4 remaining unconstitutional.
• Why what I think could be true, why it could be wrong
• Without section 4b how effective is the VRA

Conclusion

• This will be a continuing conflict until the supreme court reverses it
• The country is not in post racist America we are in currently racist America.4
• Why the VRA of ’65 was so influential until present day
• It still guards against discrimination and allows for more voting progression.