Blog Post 8- John Lippens

I. Introduction- The claim is that the rise in 3D printing of firearms

            A. Summary/Overview of the conflict as it stands

            B. Explanation of how firearms are regulated

            C. Explanation of how the Federal Firearms License is regulated and what privileges come with it

                        1. The varying types of a licenses and what they provide

                        2. How they are regulated for what they can and cannot do

            D. Various laws throughout in recent years that have covered similar topics

                        1. Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988

II. Causes and Triggering Events

            A. Direct Causes

                        1. Michael Guslick’s 3D printed AR-15 lower receiver

                        2. Defense Distributed’s  AR-15 lower receiver and Liberator handgun

                        3. “CanadianGunNut” and his “Grizzly” .22 caliber rifle

                        4. Steve Israel and the governors of New York State lobbying to extend the Undetectable Firearms Act

 

            B. Triggering Events- An explanation of how the blue prints were distributed, leading them being to be brought to the attention of the state government of New York.

III. Closing and Desirable Resolution

            A. Desirable Resolution- Explaining a solution in which the items in question are allowed to be viewed and used, but regulations do exist for the possession and manufacture of said items.

            B. Closing statements

Blog Post 7: The other triggering event?

The other claim of a triggering event is that it started not with Cody Wilson in the dead of winter in 2012, but with Michael Guslick earlier that same year. First off, his works all predate any files published by Defense Distributed, but the results were rather mixed (Mosbergen, 2012). Senator Steve Israel also started using Guslick’s work as a citation for the Undetectable Firearms Act well before Defense Distributed was well known (Brown, 2012).

 

Sources

Mosbergen, D. (2012, August, 9) Michael Guslick, Amateur Gunsmith, Claims To Have Used 3D Printer To Make Functional Semiautomatic AR-15 Rifle At Home Retrived November 5, 2013, from  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/08/man-3d-printer-rifle_n_1753513.html

Blog Post 6: The triggering event in the 3D Printing Conflict

When the Liberator and 3D printed lower receiver were released to the public by Defense Distributed, this truly began the legal reforms to cover 3D printed firearms. For example, Governor Steve Israel seeks to add regulations to 3D printed items to the New York SAFE Act(Greenberg, 2013). Governor Israel also seeks to reinstate and expand the Undetectable Firearms Act so that it may include provisions to prevent the printing of firearms (Brown,2012).

Sources:

Annotated Bibliography

Farivar, C. (2013, March 1). ArsTechnica.ArsTechnica. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/download-this-gun-3d-printed-semi-automatic-fires-over-600-rounds/

The article is coverage of the AR-15 lower receiver that has brought Defense Distributed to the forefront of 3D printing. It shows the durability of the item and how far it can be stretched based on their technology. The article also discusses the items legality and the far reach this blueprints have created.

I selected this article because it shows that these items, if made the right way, can be fearsome. The article starts specifically about the lower receiver, but then broadens when it moves on to the legality and its distribution. How the article relates to the conflict is blatant, but there is nothing I would add to the article. It covers the fragility of the item and just how easily broken the earlier iterations were.

Farivar, C. (n.d.). ArsTechnicaArsTechnica. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/07/worlds-first-fully-3d-printed-rifle-made-in-canada-fired-a-single-shot/

This article covers the short, but fascinating story of a man named Matt, or better known as “CanadianGunNut.” It shows how wide spread the influence of Cody Wilson’s work and how this issue is just one action shy of becoming an international issue. However, an amendment to this that is worth noting is that Matt now has acquired the necessary licenses to cease the behest of the Canadian Government.

I chose this article because it is an example of how wide the influence of one man can go. Matt actually is quoted  as stating that he was inspired by the AR-15 lower reciever and Liberator Pistol published by Cody Wilson. The article very specifically focuses on what has happened thus far with Matt. However, a simple update on what has happened would be very much appreciated and would be the only thing I would change

Greenberg, A. (2013, May 5). Meet The ‘Liberator’: Test-Firing The World’s First Fully 3D-Printed Gun. Forbes. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/05/05/meet-the-liberator-test-firing-the-worlds-first-fully-3d-printed-gun/

This article covers the story of the Liberator handgun. It covers it from its first test fire, to the last update to it from Defense Distributed themselves. The article shows what the determination of some can result in. The only thing I wish the article would do is update the article to show just how many variants have been released by fans of Defense Distributed and how far they have gone.

I chose this article for very obvious reasons; a detailed, up-to-date account of the most controversial item of all that I have come across. And thus, I can say without a doubt, I would add nothing to this article at all. I also really enjoy its focus on the creation of the Liberator and what happened from that point forward.

Morelle, R. (2013, June 5). Working gun made with 3D printer. BBC News. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22421185

Before I get too into this, I must state that I absolutely love using the BBC as a source of my daily news. Now, this article s on the same topic as the previous article from Forbes, but from the perspective of an international party. It shows that the this is not only a controversial series of events, but also shows that the this is an expensive and well fought over issue both internationally and domestically.

I chose this because I felt that including an international perspective on an issue like this is key. I would not add anything to this issue, but must applaud it for showing a good perspective of a 3rd party looking in on an issue. It shows how others that have minimal current involvement in this issue perceive an issue on a topic such as this.

Letter From Department of State to Defense Distributed. (2013, March 8).Scribd. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/140650957/Letter-From-Department-of-State-to-Defense-Distributed

This item is unlike the rest of the articles in this list, for this is a primary source in its purist form. This is a letter from the Department of State to Defense Distributed stating that they are to take down a specific list of files while the DOS figures out the legality and intellectual property coverage that Defense Distributed possesses. This is one of the best pieces of first hand accounting for the conflict.

I chose this because it showed how far the State Department went to try to halt Defense Distributed while the legality was still being figured out. And, as the articles will show, the legality is still being discussed. I can’t say I would like to see anything changed, because you cannot edit a document like this. I feel an article like this that provides a control style point of view is what I find perfect amidst this sea of neutral articles that I have found.

Beckhusen, R. (2013, February 13). New 3-D Printed Rifle Magazine Lets You Fire Hundreds of Rounds. Wired.com. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from   http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/printed-magazine/

This article was chosen because this is one of the less talked about items in question. The article discusses the now infamous 30 round magazine known as the “Cuomo Mag”, which is a shot at Governor Cuomo. It is short, but shares how the article shows that the item will easily be distributed and the magazine is in fact very durable.

I chose this article because it shows how quickly a very dangerous object can be ignored by the “bigger fish in the sea.” I would like to see added how, even though when this was published the Liberator was created, the fact that a functioning 30 round magazine has been created. I feel that this article is fairly informative, but only serves to be just that: informative.

 

VICE Documentary on 3D Printing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DconsfGsXyA

This documentary covers my conflict, but from the perspective of Cody Wilson and Defense Distributed and shares his thoughts on the conflict.

1) The purpose is to do as stated above; share Cody R. Wilson’s thoughts on the issue at hand and to explain the heart of the issue to those who are unaware.

2) This documentary can share with the viewer a simplified view of the 3D printing of firearms issue and from the eyes of Mr. Wilson. It also shows the view of some of the reporters who have been following this situation. 

The London Victoria & Albert museum’s interesting acquisition.

               The London V&A museum has made a great many recent acquisitions, but there is one that has drawn my topic back into the spotlight. The V&A just acquired two prototype’s of the Liberator handgun. Now, the articles have a fairly blatant similarities; both address the acquisition, both are written from a fairly neutral standpoint, and both give a quick view of the items history. However, this is where both articles take an interesting, but unsurprising twist.  

                   In the article written by CNN, the writer focuses more so on Cody Wilson’s view of the topic and does not address the acquisition, as well as views it with a bit more of a negative tone. On the other hand, BBC addresses this with a sense of fascination. The articles from the BBC addresses this more as to clarify that this is completely legal and to focus on how excited people (Mainly curators and the Museum’s director) are to have this item as well as multiple other 3D printed items on display. Unfortunately, the event that hosted these items at the V&A has since ended. 

                  Now, in terms of the sources, both articles talk to the Curators and Wilson to get opinions and both got practically the same answers. In terms of why this is news, that is quiet obvious; almost nothing like this has been placed in a museum. Never has a firearm been so readily available, so the idea that the first functioning prototype model has been downloaded and installed in a major, reputable museum is unfathomable. The bottom line is; nothing like this has happened before, and until the next true evolution in distribution and firearms comes about, nothing will live up to the nature of this display.

Sources:

(2013, September 15) V&A museum to display printed gun, BBC World Newshttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-24099293

 McNicoll, A.(2013, September 16) Download, print, fire: London Museum acquires world’s first 3D-printed gun. CNNhttp://www.cnn.com/2013/09/16/tech/innovation/museum-acquires-3d-printed-gun/index.html

 

 

3D Printing and the 2nd Amendment

3D printing is a subject that has been up for much debate in the recent months. Since the release of 3D printing design software, various groups and individuals with experience in various fields have been designing and publishing blue prints for everything from fully functioning wrenches to roofing nails and even toys and iPhone cases. However, one group has gone even further and has accidentally brought one of the most debated amendments of the Constitution of the United States, The Second Amendment, into the forefront of the debate. The group Defense Distributed has been attempting to develop the first functioning 3D printed firearm for the past couple of years. The end result has been multiple functioning AR-15 lower receivers, which is the housing of the vital mechanisms for the weapon, and a handgun known as “The Liberator”, the first 3D printed single-shot handgun that is completely functioning.

             Since the release of these blueprints, various gun control advocates from many government and corporate roles have been attempting to shut down Defense Distributed. The resulting legal war that has been raging for a little over a year can be boiled down to this; The U.S. Government wants the removal of these files from the internet and Defense Distributed, as well as various supporting groups, wants to ensure their stay and availability on the internet. The actions taken include bills passed in New York state and proposed bills by numerous others on the control side of the debate to regulate the blueprints, while Defense Distributed and the supporting parties have relocated the files numerous times to numerous places to avoid permanent deletion. The bottom line is, this battle is on-going with no end in the immediate future and clearly is going to be an event that defines this generation and maybe even the next.    

 

 

Bibliograhy:

“3D Printing: From Dental Braces to Astronauts’ Seats.” The Economist. N.p., 7 Sept. 2013. Web. 11 Sept. 2013.

Kerr, Dara. “3D-printed Guns May Face Regulations, Bans in New York.” CNET News. CBS Interactive, 13 June 2013. Web. 16 Sept. 2013.

Satell, Greg. “What We Should Do About 3D Printed Guns.” Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 21 May 2013. Web. 16 Sept. 2013.

“About | Defense Distributed.” About | Defense Distributed. Defense Distributed, Neon Roots, n.d. Web. 16 Sept. 2013.